LEVERAGING SEMANTIC ANALYSIS IN MACHINE LEARNING FOR ADDRESSING UNSTRUCTURED CHALLENGES IN EDUCATION

Abstract

The present study explores the role of semantic analysis in machine learning for addressing unstructured challenges in education. Through a comparative analysis and literature review, various semantic analysis techniques and machine learning algorithms were investigated, examining their effectiveness and the factors influencing their success in educational contexts. The findings demonstrate that advanced semantic analysis techniques, such as word embeddings and deep learning-based approaches, significantly improve the performance of machine learning algorithms in processing unstructured data, leading to better natural language understanding and more accurate insights from educational data. Factors such as data quality, algorithmic complexity, and computational resources play a crucial role in determining the success of semantic analysis-based machine learning models in education. The study concludes with recommendations for further development and application of semantic analysis and machine learning in education.

Keyword

References

Deerwester, S., Dumais, S. T., Furnas, G. W., Landauer, T. K., & Harshman, R. (1990). Indexing by hidden semantic analysis, 41(6), 391-407. [2] Landauer, T. K., McNamara, D. S., Dennis, S., & Kintsch, W. (Eds.). (2007). Handbook of hidden semantic analysis. [3] Radford, A , Narayanaswamy, S., Sutskever, I., & Salakhutdinov, R. (2018). Improving language understanding by generative pre-training. [4] Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., … & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need, 87, 12-20. [5] Wang, Y., Liu, S., Afzal, N., Rastegar-Mojarad, M., Wang, L., Shen, F., … & Liu, H. (2018). A comparison of word embeddings for the biomedical natural language processing. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 87, 12-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2018.09.008 [6] Gunning, D., & Aha, D. W. (2019). DARPA’s Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) program. AI Magazine, 40(2), 44-58. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v40i2.2850 [7] Fayziev, R. A., Rodionov, A. A., & Jakupov, G. A. (2023). Integration of machine learning in the circular economy: Optimizing resource efficiency and sustainability. Tashkent State University of Economics; Institute for Staff Advanced Training and Statistical Research; Uzbekistan State World Languages University. [8] Gulyamov, S., Rustambekov, I., Narziev, O., & Xudayberganov, A. (2021). Draft Concept of the Republic of Uzbekistan in the Field of Development Artificial Intelligence for 2021-2030. Yurisprudensiya, 1, 107-21. [9] Pennington, J., Socher, R., & Manning, C. D. (2014). GloVe: Global vectors for word representation. [10] Bengio, Y., Courville, A., & Vincent, P. (2013). Representation learning: A review and new perspectives,35(8),1798-1828. [11] Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013). Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. [12] Slade, S., & Prinsloo, P. (2013). Learning analytics: Ethical issues and dilemmas. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1510-1529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213479366 [13] Aggarwal, C. C., & Zhai, C. (2012). A survey of text classification algorithms. In Mining text data (pp. 163-222). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3223-4_6 [14] Picciano, A. G. (2012). The evolution of big data and learning analytics in American higher education. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(3), 9-20. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ971042 [15] Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. I. (2003). Hidden Dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 993-1022.